Kilpeck is 7-8 miles southwest of Hereford, the earthworks of the castle lie between the small ornate church of c1140 to the east and a hollow to the west. The graveyard of the nearby church is now beginning to encroach on the castle site. Description of the site today. The earthworks consist of a motte with a base diameter of c.50m rising 8m to a summit 28m in diameter with a large kidney shaped inner bailey to the east, between the castle and the settlement. The motte is completely surrounded by a ditch.

The inner bailey has remains of a rampart along its north and south sides. It was entered from the southeast where a gap in the rampart is flanked on one side by a small mound, perhaps once a small gatehouse.

There are 2 outer baileys which survive on the south and west surrounded by either ditches or scarps. The Royal Commission for Historical Monuments (RCHM, 1931, 158) noted a third outer bailey to the north in 1931 but this has since been destroyed.

On the west of the site a stream has been dammed by a continuation of the north bank of the western outer bailey, this was presumably to form a fishpond.

History of the castle.

The Book of Llandaff, a 12th century compilation of Anglo-Saxon charters, indicates that southwest Herefordshire was part of the British kingdom of Erging, or Archenfield and suggests that a church existed here as early as the 8th century. Archenfield had many connections with Celtic religion and was the centre of the work of Dubricius, a Celtic saint born at Madley in the 5th century. 1086: In the Domesday Survey Kilpeck (entered as Chipeete) was given by the Conqueror to William Fitz Norman, the castle is thought to have been built around c1090 as the administrative centre of Archenfield. According to the Domesday Survey Kilpeck had '3 ploughs, 2 serfs and 4 oxmen and there are 57 men with 19 ploughs.'

1134: The castle is mentioned when Hugh de Kilpeck gave its revenues to the newly founded priory some 350m southeast of the church. Hugh also gave the nearby church of St David and the chapel of St Mary within the castle grounds to the Abbey of Gloucester.Hugh was probably responsible for the building of the church at Kilpeck and for the rebuilding of the castle some time before he died in 1169.

1200: John de Kilpeck and his heirs were granted the Bailiwick of all the forests of Herefordshire forever by King John.

1204: Hugh’s grandson John dies young leaving his son Hugh as heir. Due to the very young age of Hugh William de Cantilupe, sheriff of Herefordshire was appointed by the king to take control of the Kilpeck estates.

1207: William de Cantilupes widow was induced by King John to accept William Fitz Waryn as her husband. Their son Hugh succeeded to the office of custodian of the royal forests in Herefordshire. Hugh left 2 heiresses, the younger of which took Kilpeck as dower to William de Waleraund, Sheriff of Wiltshire. The eldest son Robert took part in the Baron’s Wars fighting for the king.

1211,1212 and 1214: King John is entertained in the castle. His host was William de Cantilupe, Sheriff of Herefordshire, who continued to manage the estates long after Hugh had come of age.

1244: Hugh eventually took over the estates but died in this year leaving two heiresses. His eldest daughter Isobel married William Waleraund and took Kilpeck as her dowry.

1259: The king grants that a weekly Friday market and annual fair may be held at Kilpeck.

1273: William Waleraund had no heirs and on his death Kilpeck passed to his nephew Alan Plukenet or Plugenet, who owned vast estates around Hereford and who was one of the principal benefactors of the Abbey of Dore, 6km west of Kilpeck..

1295-1297: Alan Plukenet is summoned to Parliament as a Baron. He was also present at the battle of Evesham in 1265.

1299: Alan Plukenet dies, he was succeeded by his son Alan.

1309: Alan was granted the right to hold a weekly market at Kilpeck as well as a two day fair twice a year.

1311: Alan Plukenet II is made a Baron at Parliament.

1325: Alan Plukenet II dies without heir, his sister Joan is married to Edward de Bohun, and they inherit Kilpeck. At this time Kilpeck had a total value of £62 0s 6d – a considerable sum. Edward de Bohun grants Kilpeck to his brother-in-law, James Butler, Earl of Ormond. As the Earls of Ormond live outside of the county the castle begins to decay. The value had dropped by 2/3 when the Earl of Ormond died in 1338.

1349: The famines and Black Death of this time appear to have greatly affected the settlement that had been built up around the castle, the priory was often unable to pay its debts and was dissolved in 1428.

1467: Kilpeck remains with the Butlers until the 5^th earl is beheaded in March of this year. Kilpeck manor reverts to the Crown. King Edward grants it to Sir William Herbert, 1^st Earl of Pembroke, in reward for his services to the House of York.

1469: William Herbert is captured in battle at Edge-cote, Banbury and beheaded for deserting King Edward. Edward IV restores Kilpeck to John, the 6th Earl of Ormond. John died in the Holy Land on his way to Jerusalem. He was described as the ‘goodliest knight and finest gentleman in Christendom.’ (Robinson).

His brother Thomas who was called as a Baron to English Parliament succeeds John. His elder daughter took Kilpeck as dower to James St Leger.

1530’s: when Leland visited the castle he describes it as ‘sum ruins of the walls still stand.’

1545: Their son George was Lord of Kilpeck but the family terminated in heiresses.

1635-1645: Although the castle is by this time pretty much in ruins, it was still garrisoned in the Civil War, but was never attacked. The Parliamentarians, to ensure that it would never stand as the castle it had once been, slighted it at the end of the war.

17^th Century: Kilpeck passed to the Pyes of Saddlebow and the Mynde.

Kilpeck Castle had been built with an appreciation of the surrounding landscape. King John enjoyed the area when he hunted in Haywood Forest and it contained private gardens and ponds. Although the castle was abandoned in the 14^th Century the park was still valued and mentioned as late as the middle of the 17^th Century. It is an excellent example of a planned medieval settlement where the village has grown up around the castle.

Excavation.

In 1912 the graveyard of the church of St David was extended into part of the inner bailey of the castle. BY 1982 this area was almost full and the Parochial Church Council wished to extend into an area to the north. To determine whether this extension was a threat to the remaining archaeological record a 5m wide area along the western boundary of the proposed extension was stripped to the first archaeological layer and a 1m wide trench was excavated. At least 7 different periods were identified.

The first period excavated was the pre-rampart deposits, they were constant at a horizontal level and lay over the natural red-brown clay and sandstone. This layer was interpreted as pre-castle ground surface. The 2nd period was the rampart construction which was composed of re-deposited clay and sandstone, which appeared to have come from the digging of the ditch. No associated features such as palisade postholes or any stone walling were found on the rampart. The 3rd period consisted of a layer of stones covering an area c15m north to south lying over the tail end of the rampart to the north. It was made up of small fragments of sandstone onto which larger sandstone blocks had been placed. It was interpreted as a stone trackway or yard.

Period 4 was cut by eight pits and 4 postholes. nearly all these continued beyond the boundary of the excavation and so their exact shape and function is unclear.

Period 5 included 3 circular postholes, all on the same alignment and of approximately the same dimensions. They contained large packing stones and had probably contained the large vertical posts of a timber building.

Period 6 contained the remnants of two stone walls  and 2 stone surfaces were recorded within the area of the 5m wide excavation. One wall and stone area lay against the rampart at the north end and the other wall and stone area lay against the southern end. Both walls were composed of irregular flat sandstone pieces, with occasional pieces of limestone bonded together with clay. Due to the small area excavated it is unclear whether these walls were connected. Behind the wall at the north end the gap between it and the rampart had been filled in with roofing tiles some of which had been glazed. The stone layer at the south end was compacted and worn and was interpreted as the remains of a yard surface.

Kilpeck motte and ditch ©Paul Wood 2003

Period 7 was composed of a thick orange-brown silty clay that covered the walls of period 6. This layer was probably derived from the weathering of, and downwash from, the rampart since the abandonment of the castle in the 15th century.

The finds.

There were only a few finds recovered. xMedieval cooking pots and glazed jug fragments were recovered from periods 1-6 and suggested a date range from the 12th to the 14th/15th centuries. A number of stone roof tiles were recovered. Part of a spur, a knife blade and an iron buckle were recovered from the stone surface of period 6 and half a large sandstone grinding stone was found on the face of the eroded rampart.